Crypto Tax Degens is dedicated to providing objective, evidence-based, and trustworthy information and guidance on all aspects of cryptocurrency taxation in the UK. We believe that informed decision-making is essential in the complex field of cryptocurrency taxation.
We are committed to accuracy, balance, and transparency in our content. Information provided will be rigorously assessed against the best available scientific evidence, with sources named wherever possible. When content contains conjecture or opinion, it will be clearly indicated.
Crypto Tax Degens is accountable to its audiences and is open to admitting mistakes. We value user feedback as an opportunity for learning and improvement. Our editorial processes are transparent, ensuring trustworthiness.
2.3 Serving the public:
While we consult with relevant professional bodies, charities, and interest groups, our primary focus is serving our clients’ interests. We believe in putting our audiences’ interests first when sourcing and developing content.
2.4 Taste and decency:
All content on our website is suitable for a general audience and does not include reasonably deemed offensive material.
2.5 Impartiality and diversity of opinion:
We maintain objectivity, impartiality, and even-handedness in our content. When no scientific consensus exists, we reflect all significant strands of opinion and clearly state uncertainties.
We are committed to strict privacy controls. Personal information and correspondence will not be disclosed without explicit user consent unless required by law or in the public interest. Permission will be sought for using photographic images.
Crypto Tax Degens maintains high editorial standards through the following:
3.1 Conflicts of Interest:
No website editor, author, or administrator is permitted to provide favoured treatment to any partner organisation. All editorial staff must disclose any financial or other interests related to cryptocurrency tax companies or organisations. Our Head Of Operations investigates potential conflicts or complaints, ensuring transparency.
All editorial staff receive training to ensure adherence to editorial standards. This includes training topics, frequency, and evaluation.
5.1 Phase 1: Research:
Our content relies on evidence-based knowledge from industry-specific sources. Content authors consult peer-reviewed research and individuals with direct experience. We classify research evidence based on validity.
5.2 Phase 2: Production:
Content undergoes rigorous editing for accuracy, balance, accessibility, tone, and adherence to house style. The website Editor ensures overall presentation, clarity, and adherence to our standards.
5.3 Phase 3: Policy Sign-off:
Our Chief Executive Officer approves policies before they are published online.
5.4 Phase 4: Review of Content:
We systematically review content, with major content undergoing annual review and less susceptible content reviewed at least every two years. User and stakeholder comments are considered daily, with content amended if necessary.
In the rare event of a complaint about online content that the editor cannot resolve, the matter will be escalated to the Chief Executive Officer.
For feedback, questions, or reporting issues related to our content or the editorial process, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Effective Date: [16/10/23]